Every now and again a member of the FALC pops up and wants me to stop writing about my experiences of being abused AND the church on the same blog.
This one suggests the following - "It would be right and fair for you to remove the church's name from your blog as the church had nothing to do with the abuse you endured by your father."
And, they want to sue me for defamation and libel.
I had to look up defamation to see what it literally stood for and was I wrong in my writings.
"the action of damaging the good reputation of someone; slander or libel."
Slander- is a false statement.
I am not speaking falsely.
This is true for my experience.
Libel - Publishing a false statement.
Again, in my experience it is true. As a member (now former) of the church I was abused.
I link the church in, for its influence on my family was huge.
Also, its teaching of the forgiveness of sins- created the perfect shield for my father and his sexual abuse. They knew; but forgave and he continued on. This is true; not a false statement.
Based on my listening to victim's stories, I know that I am not a rare occurrence OR the only one.
I also know, that what the members of the church want is to keep its reputation pure. And, if they can separate my father - the church remains untouched.
I am here to tell you it is not pure; anymore.
And, they want me to shut up about it.
I am in the top 5 if you google "First Apostolic Lutheran Church" and that does not shine a positive light upon the church.
So, they want to sue me to make it pure again.
But will it???
Will shutting me up help keep the integrity of the church.
I am seen as one bad apple trying to spoil the whole bunch.
What again bothers me, is that the ones who step forward care more about the reputation of the church than the possibilities of abuse being among its members.
IF the preacher in the Calumet church is speaking about abuse from the pulpit and asking the abusers to turn themselves IN. I am not the only one who speaks to tarnish the reputation of the church. However, he is doing so in the confines of the church community. I am out and public.
I did make a casual contact with a lawyer I know and ask his opinion.
He said. "Truth is a defense." and, "As long as it's true, no one can stop you. The truth causes no damages to sue upon. Keep telling the truth."
That is my intent.
I know that I am making folks uncomfortable.
The truth usually does that.
Isn't there a saying "The truth shall set you free; but at first it will piss you off...or make you miserable."
While I know there are some who squirm as I write, there are others who feel less alone.
My voice isn't for the doubters; it is for those whose lives sadly echo mine.
Breaking the silence is not the easy path - for the reason that there are so many who are not wanting it to be broken.
Abuse is the place where silence is preferred.
When you speak out -
It ruins reputations.
Wrecks families.
Destroys lives.
But, is the breaking silence to be blamed OR the person(s) who did the abusing.
Be angry at me...but, I am not the one who is destroying the reputation of the church. It is instead the members within who abuse.
I am one woman who has had the experience of being a member of the church and was abused.
One woman who is writing about it.
Your initial defense for the church and not its innocent members - is why it is so hard to speak up.
While they believe I am rare, what is more rare is a current member of the church who will volunteer to help eradicate abuse within the church (members).
Those who have approached me, have done so to silence me and defend the church.
And, they even want to almost separate the church from its members; both past and present.
Keeping it up high and out of reach from soiling.
I would actually welcome an investigation.
Bring it on.
Let us all shine a light and see what is exposed.
"There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true." Soren Kierkegaard